Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42324801›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of technology assessment in health care2026

Practice and challenges of HB-HTA in China: insights from hospital management and clinical perspectives.

Yujie Xia, Sheng Han, Lanting Lyu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of technology assessment in health care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yujie XiaHealth Technology Assessment and Policy Evaluation Group, https://ror.org/041pakw92Renmin University of China, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6737-3599
Sheng HanInternational Research Center for Medicinal Administration, https://ror.org/02v51f717Peking University, China.
Lanting LyuHealth Technology Assessment and Policy Evaluation Group, https://ror.org/041pakw92Renmin University of China, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9852-7035

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aims to investigate the awareness, practices, needs, and challenges of hospital-based health technology assessment (HB-HTA) in China's tertiary public hospitals, drawing on perspectives from both hospital management and clinical practice.

methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with seventeen participants representing six major tertiary public hospitals in China. Respondents included vice presidents, clinical department directors, and heads of pharmacy. The questionnaire explored four dimensions consistent with China's national performance appraisal framework: medical quality, operational efficiency, sustainable development, and satisfaction. Data were analyzed using NVivo 14 for qualitative responses and Excel 2021 for quantitative metrics.

resultsThe findings revealed that 82.35 percent (14/17) of hospitals lacked dedicated HB-HTA teams, with decisions made primarily by coordination between Medical Affairs Offices (28.89 percent, 13/45) and Pharmacy Departments (22.22 percent, 10/45). Safety (28.26 percent, 13/46), effectiveness (23.91 percent, 11/46), and cost-effectiveness (19.57 percent, 9/46) were prioritized criteria, yet only 29.41 percent (5/17) of institutions used formal HB-HTA tools. Divergence persisted between administrators' organizational priorities and clinicians' patient-centered perspectives. Despite barriers reported by 62.8 percent (27/43) of respondents' institutions, 88.24 percent (15/17) expressed an urgent or recognized need for HB-HTA implementation.

conclusionsFor effective HB-HTA implementation in China, addressing capacity deficits and reconciling stakeholder perspectives is essential. A project-based strategy, supported by government real-world data platforms and interdisciplinary teams, is recommended for contextually-appropriate evaluation frameworks.

Indexed as

Hospital AdministrationHospitals, PublicTechnology Assessment, BiomedicalTertiary Care CentersChinaCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansInterviews as TopicSurveys and QuestionnairesChinadecision makinghospital-based health technology assessmenthospital managementmedical technology adoption

Identifiers

PMID42324801
PMCPMC13319477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.