ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2026
A pilot qualitative study of patient understanding and perceptions of genetic counselors and cascade testing in the context of transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis.
Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genetics-informed care is becoming increasingly important in the management of cardiomyopathy (CM). Despite current guidelines recommending genetic testing and counselors, these services are vastly underutilized. To our knowledge, this is the first qualitative study to examine patient perspectives (n = 10) on genetic counselors and cascade testing in the context of cardiovascular care in transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR), with the goal to inform implementation strategies for integrating genetic services. Codebook thematic analysis of semistructured interviews was conducted with adult patients diagnosed with ATTR or at-risk family members between June and August 2024. Data were evaluated through deductive and inductive coding. Five key themes were identified: (1) patients had limited understanding of genetic counselors' roles; (2) the likelihood of a patient seeing a genetic counselor was significantly influenced by strength of cardiovascular provider recommendation; (3) patient experiences with genetic counselors were generally favorable, especially psychosocial support; (4) patients suggested additional refinements for genetic counseling, including the desire for cardiac-specific expertise; (5) patients faced considerable challenges communicating the importance of genetic testing to family members, largely due to stigma and family members' preference to avoid distress associated with testing. These findings highlight the need for implementation of science-based approaches to improve patient education about genetic counselors, emphasize recommendations from cardiovascular providers, train cardiac-specific genetic counselors, and develop innovative tools to support family communication around cascade testing. Addressing these areas can enhance the integration of genetic services into routine CM care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.