Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42324786›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical pharmacology2026

Ketamine Dosing Across Clinical Indications: A Narrative Review Organized by Proposed NMDA-Related Mechanisms.

Paul Glue, Ben Beaglehole

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Paul GluePsychological Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin and Christchurch, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7305-2800
Ben BeagleholePsychological Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin and Christchurch, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9521-1745

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ketamine is a non-competitive antagonist at the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) glutamate receptor. It was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for anesthesia in 1970. The only other related US regulatory approval since then has been for esketamine nasal spray for depression in 2019. Over this time ketamine has been repurposed by mainly academic researchers, reporting clinical activity in diverse disorders such as status epilepticus, acute asthma, hyperactive delirium, and treatment resistant depression and anxiety. Importantly, dosing and length of treatment varies considerably by indication. Clinical indications responsive to ketamine fall into three categories: those where glutamatergic tone is normal and NMDA antagonism produces a desired effect (e.g., single bolus dosing for anesthesia, procedural sedation, and acute pain treatment); disorders where there is overactivity in glutamatergic tone and NMDA antagonism is therapeutic (e.g., prolonged infusion dosing for status epilepticus or status asthmaticus); and disorders where NMDA antagonism can enhance neuroplasticity (e.g., intermittent bolus treatment for depression/anxiety). Ketamine doses and duration of dosing differ for each of these three categories. This categorization may help generate hypotheses regarding dosing strategies for other potential novel indications such as eclampsia, anorexia nervosa, or functional neurological disorders.

Indexed as

Excitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsKetamineReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateAnimalsDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsKetamineReceptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartateanesthesiaanxietyasthmadepressionepilepsyketaminepainrepurposing

Identifiers

PMID42324786
PMCPMC13284452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.