Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42324784›Full record

ArticleHeadache2026

A patient-centered conceptual model and measurement framework for migraine experience developed by the Migraine Clinical Outcome Assessment System.

Rikki Mangrum, Alexandra L Bryant, Carrie R Houts, James S McGinley, Dawn C Buse, Richard B Lipton, R J Wirth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Headache, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rikki MangrumVector Psychometric Group, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6231-5890
Alexandra L BryantVector Psychometric Group, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Carrie R HoutsVector Psychometric Group, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1233-9389
James S McGinleyVector Psychometric Group, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Dawn C BuseVector Psychometric Group, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Richard B LiptonNeurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.
R J WirthVector Psychometric Group, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

FDA HHS UH3 FD006795U.S. Food and Drug Administration UH3FD006795
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop a comprehensive, evidence-based, patient-centered conceptual model of migraine and to derive a measurement framework for the development or selection of clinical outcome assessments used in clinical trials of treatments for migraine.

backgroundImproving ways of assessing the outcomes that matter to people who live with migraine is an important goal for treatment development and evaluation. The Migraine Clinical Outcome Assessment System (MiCOAS) project aimed to gather qualitative data directly from people with migraine and develop a patient-centered core set of outcomes and endpoints for migraine clinical trials. Data gathered by the MiCOAS research team was used to develop a patient-centered conceptual model of migraine and a measurement framework designed to capture outcomes that matter to patients.

methodsA post hoc, pooled secondary interpretive analysis of the results from two MiCOAS qualitative studies (executed in 2020 and 2021 with 71 US adults with migraine) was conducted to develop the conceptual model using iterative diagramming methods to create a visualization. Supporting information exhibits for the visualization were created to record concept definitions and describe their interrelationships. The conceptual model was used to guide development of a measurement framework intended to support the selection or development of patient-reported outcome assessments suitable for regulated clinical trials of both acute and preventive migraine therapies. Input from people with migraine, patient advocates, clinical researchers, and subject matter experts was integrated into the model and the measurement framework.

resultsThe comprehensive conceptual model diagram organizes patient-reported experiences into domains for symptoms and impacts of migraine and depicts commonly occurring mediating contextual factors (e.g., perceived pain tolerance) that can affect patients' self-reported disease experiences. The measurement framework identifies concepts that are widely experienced or highly disabling to patients with episodic or chronic migraine but also meet the needs of clinical trial endpoint design (e.g., are cross-culturally relevant and amenable to treatment effect within a 3-month trial period) and are capable of capturing experiences during all phases of migraine, including interictal periods.

conclusionsThe patient-centered conceptual model of migraine provides a concise but comprehensive framework for describing and measuring patient experiences of migraine disease and its treatment, including symptoms, daily functioning, and distal outcomes that result from the aggregation of migraine experiences over time. The measurement framework was developed to support comprehensive endpoint design for migraine clinical trials and has been used to guide the development of the MiCOAS measurement instruments.

Indexed as

Migraine DisordersOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient-Centered Careconceptual modelingfunctioningmeasurementpatient‐focused drug developmentquality of lifesymptoms

Identifiers

PMID42324784
PMCPMC13571062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.