ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2026
Development and Validation of Machine-Learning-Based Prediction Models for Thyroid Diseases During Pregnancy.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND International guidelines recommend early screening based on targeted risk factors to identify thyroid disease during pregnancy. The complexity of these risk factors makes accurate prediction challenging. This study aimed to develop and compare multiple machine-learning-based predictive models for thyroid disease during pregnancy. MATERIAL AND METHODS This retrospective study analyzed the clinical characteristics of 5461 women who gave birth at a single center. The dataset was divided into training and test sets. In the training set, feature variables associated with thyroid disease during pregnancy were selected using the Boruta algorithm. Eight models were developed: logistic regression, Bayesian approach, k-nearest neighbors, support vector machine, neural network, classification and regression tree, extreme gradient boosting, and random forest (RF). Model performance was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, precision-recall curve (PRC), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis. RESULTS Nine feature variables were identified: age, height, pre-pregnancy weight, gravidity, parity, primiparity or multiparity, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, scarred uterus, and autoimmune disease. The RF model demonstrated the best performance, with accuracy of 0.98387819 and 0.99597990, Matthews correlation coefficient of 0.96794139 and 0.97781292, log loss of 0.12670703 and 0.09442025, Brier score of 0.02495798 and 0.01921069, area under the ROC curve of 0.99877170 and 0.99991140, and area under the PRC of 0.99864486 and 0.99922572 in the training and test sets, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The RF model demonstrates excellent discriminative performance, accuracy, consistency, and generalizability in predicting thyroid disease during pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.