ArticleCancer medicine2026
Colorectal Cancer Screening Beyond Primary Care: A Community-Based FIT Distribution Model Serving a Safety-Net Hospital Population.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) remains the second leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States, with screening disparities disproportionately affecting socioeconomically disadvantaged and underrepresented populations. Although outreach-based CRC screening programs using fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) have been previously described, many have focused on patients already engaged with primary care. The ACCESS (Advancing Colorectal Cancer Equity through Systematic Screening) initiative evaluates a community-based FIT distribution strategy designed to reach individuals outside traditional primary care pathways.
objectiveTo describe the implementation, feasibility, screening outcomes, follow-up colonoscopy completion, and exploratory financial considerations of the ACCESS initiative at Temple University Hospital (TUH).
methodsACCESS distributed FIT in non-traditional, high-traffic community settings to average-risk individuals aged 45-75 years, consistent with United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines. The program was designed to reach individuals facing barriers to routine preventive screening.
resultsAmong 799 FIT distributed, 293 results were reported, yielding a response rate of 36.7%. Forty-eight FIT were positive, corresponding to a positivity rate of 16.4%. Individuals without a primary care visit in the preceding year had a higher FIT positivity rate than those with a recent primary care visit, although this difference did not reach statistical significance (26.5% vs. 15.1%; p = 0.064). Among men, positivity was 41.4% in those without a recent primary care visit compared with 16.0% in those with a recent visit (p = 0.056). Follow-up colonoscopy was completed at TUH in 29.2% of positive FIT cases, while follow-up outside Temple Health may not have been fully captured. Exploratory financial analysis showed higher average reimbursement per FIT-prompted colonoscopy CPT code compared with non-FIT-prompted colonoscopy codes ($1171.62 vs. $1084.60).
conclusionACCESS demonstrates the feasibility of community-based FIT outreach outside traditional primary care pathways and provides insight into screening outcomes, follow-up challenges, and financial considerations within an urban safety-net health system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.