Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42324625›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2026

Colorectal Cancer Screening Beyond Primary Care: A Community-Based FIT Distribution Model Serving a Safety-Net Hospital Population.

Christopher Grivas, Daohai Yu, Abraham Ifrah, Manasa Vallabhaneni, Brianna Graham, Daniel Kotas, Gabrielle Gillow, Shelby Mcneilly, Samyuktha Manikandan, Nikita Dahake and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Christopher GrivasTemple University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6603-2953
Daohai YuCenter for Biostatistics & Epidemiology, Department of Biomedical Education and Data Science, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Abraham IfrahTemple University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Manasa VallabhaneniTemple University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Brianna GrahamTemple University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Daniel KotasTemple University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Gabrielle GillowTemple University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Shelby McneillyTemple University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Samyuktha ManikandanTemple University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Nikita DahakeTemple University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1545-0939
Darina ChudnovskayaCenter for Biostatistics & Epidemiology, Department of Biomedical Education and Data Science, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Rishabh KhatriTemple University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Claire RaabTemple University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

Independence Blue Cross Clinical Care Innovation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) remains the second leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States, with screening disparities disproportionately affecting socioeconomically disadvantaged and underrepresented populations. Although outreach-based CRC screening programs using fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) have been previously described, many have focused on patients already engaged with primary care. The ACCESS (Advancing Colorectal Cancer Equity through Systematic Screening) initiative evaluates a community-based FIT distribution strategy designed to reach individuals outside traditional primary care pathways.

objectiveTo describe the implementation, feasibility, screening outcomes, follow-up colonoscopy completion, and exploratory financial considerations of the ACCESS initiative at Temple University Hospital (TUH).

methodsACCESS distributed FIT in non-traditional, high-traffic community settings to average-risk individuals aged 45-75 years, consistent with United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines. The program was designed to reach individuals facing barriers to routine preventive screening.

resultsAmong 799 FIT distributed, 293 results were reported, yielding a response rate of 36.7%. Forty-eight FIT were positive, corresponding to a positivity rate of 16.4%. Individuals without a primary care visit in the preceding year had a higher FIT positivity rate than those with a recent primary care visit, although this difference did not reach statistical significance (26.5% vs. 15.1%; p = 0.064). Among men, positivity was 41.4% in those without a recent primary care visit compared with 16.0% in those with a recent visit (p = 0.056). Follow-up colonoscopy was completed at TUH in 29.2% of positive FIT cases, while follow-up outside Temple Health may not have been fully captured. Exploratory financial analysis showed higher average reimbursement per FIT-prompted colonoscopy CPT code compared with non-FIT-prompted colonoscopy codes ($1171.62 vs. $1084.60).

conclusionACCESS demonstrates the feasibility of community-based FIT outreach outside traditional primary care pathways and provides insight into screening outcomes, follow-up challenges, and financial considerations within an urban safety-net health system.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerSafety-net ProvidersAgedColonoscopyFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedOccult BloodPrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID42324625
PMCPMC13284082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.