Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42324596›Full record

SynthesisBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026

Microbial named entity recognition and normalisation for AI-assisted literature review and meta-analysis.

Dhylan Patel, Antoine D Lain, Avish Vijayaraghavan, Nazanin Faghih-Mirzaei, Monica N Mweetwa, Meiqi Wang, Tim Beck, Joram M Posma

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dhylan PatelSection of Bioinformatics, Division of Systems Medicine, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, United Kingdom.
Antoine D LainSection of Bioinformatics, Division of Systems Medicine, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7168-863X
Avish VijayaraghavanSection of Bioinformatics, Division of Systems Medicine, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0007-2821-1917
Nazanin Faghih-MirzaeiSection of Bioinformatics, Division of Systems Medicine, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, United Kingdom.
Monica N MweetwaSection of Bioinformatics, Division of Systems Medicine, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2679-3697
Meiqi WangSection of Bioinformatics, Division of Systems Medicine, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, United Kingdom.
Tim BeckCentre for Health Informatics, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0292-7972
Joram M PosmaSection of Bioinformatics, Division of Systems Medicine, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4971-9003

Funding

Centre for Doctoral Training in AI for Healthcare PhD studentship EP/S023283/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationManual curation of biomedical literature is slow and error-prone and while large language models trained on general texts have shown to be useful for text summarisation, these methods lack the domain-specific expertise required to perform this task accurately. Here we describe the creation of the first microbiome-specific text corpus, use this to train deep learning algorithms for named-entity recognition (NER) and entity linking (EL), and demonstrate their use to meta-analyse microbiome literature.

resultsThe training and validation set (n = 1410) contained a total of 90 150 annotations (both long form and abbreviations). Using the gold-standard test set (n = 288), with an inter-annotator agreement rate of 99.52% for NER and 88.31% for EL, the trained models were evaluated and our fine-tuned BioBERT model achieved an F1-score of 96% for NER surpassing a rule- and dictionary-based annotation pipeline (94%). For EL the accuracy obtained by the deep learning models greatly surpassed that of the pipeline (91% vs 69%). Evaluated across the entire available literature (n = 6927) across 14 domains, our models annotate an entire full-text document in only 7 seconds. AVAILABILITY: All codes are available for automatic annotation and model training, with instructions on how to deploy the model on new text, from GitHub at https://github.com/omicsNLP/microbELP and Zenodo at https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20613467. The redistributable, annotated training set and unannotated test set are made available from Zenodo at https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17305410 with the redistributable, human-labelled test set hosted as benchmark on Codabench at https://www.codabench.org/competitions/10913/ (for NER only) and at https://www.codabench.org/competitions/11581/ (for NER+EL) for evaluation. The annotated documents for all available literature are hosted separately on Zenodo at https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17288826.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceData CurationData MiningDeep LearningMicrobiotaAlgorithmsLarge Language Models

Identifiers

PMID42324596
PMCPMC13342716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.