ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2026
Short-term effects of static stretching versus myofascial release on hamstring tightness and lower extremity function in sedentary IT professionals: a randomized controlled trial.
Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06586554 (Comparative Effectiveness of Static Stretching Versus Myofascial Release on Hamstring Muscle Tightness in IT Professionals), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparative Effectiveness of Static Stretching Versus Myofascial Release on Hamstring Muscle Tightness in IT Professionals: A Randomized Comparative Study
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundProlonged sedentary work is associated with hamstring tightness, reduced flexibility, and functional limitations among information technology (IT) professionals. Comparative evidence for static stretching and myofascial release (MFR) in this population remains limited.
objectiveTo compare the short-term effects of static stretching and myofascial release on hamstring tightness and lower extremity function in sedentary IT professionals.
methodsIn this two-arm randomized controlled trial, 30 IT professionals were allocated to static stretching (n = 15) or MFR (n = 15). Both groups received stipulated treatment five times weekly for three weeks. Active knee extension range of motion (AKE-ROM) was the primary outcome measure, and the self-reported Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) was the secondary outcome measure. Outcomes assessments were performed at baseline and days 8, 15, and 22. Data were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models examining group, time, and group-by-time interaction effects, with Bonferroni-adjusted post hoc comparisons.
resultsBoth interventions significantly improved AKE-ROM and self-reported LEFS over time (all p < 0.001). A significant group-by-time interaction favored static stretching for AKE-ROM, with greater adjusted improvements at Day 15 (mean difference 3.27°, 95% CI 2.28-4.26) and Day 22 (5.20°, 95% CI 4.21-6.19; both p < 0.001). Although these between-group differences were statistically significant, the Day 22 difference remained smaller than previously reported minimal detectable change values for the AKE test. Self-reported LEFS scores improved significantly in both groups, with between-group differences remaining small and below clinically meaningful thresholds, indicating broadly comparable functional benefit. Sensitivity analyses adjusting for age and BMI yielded consistent findings. No adverse events were reported.
conclusionsBoth interventions improved AKE-ROM and self-reported LEFS over the study period. Static stretching demonstrated statistically greater improvements in AKE-ROM; however, the magnitude of this difference was smaller than published minimal detectable change values, and its clinical importance remains uncertain. Given the absence of a control group and the short follow-up period, findings should be interpreted cautiously.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT06586554; initial release date: 04/09/2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.