ArticleEye and vision (London, England)2026
Network pharmacology and molecular dynamics simulations reveal shared mechanisms and myopia-specific targets of atropine in myopia and dry eye disease.
Article in Eye and vision (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ocular Surface Outcomes with Different 0.05% Atropine Dosing Frequencies in Children with Myopia: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAtropine is an effective agent for myopia control; however, clinical reports have indicated potential side effects associated with inducing or exacerbating dry eye disease (DED). It remains unclear whether the therapeutic targets involved in atropine-mediated myopia control overlap with those potentially associated with ocular surface effects. Therefore, this study aimed to characterise the shared or distinct target landscape and plausible molecular pathways through which atropine may contribute to myopia control while also being associated with dry eye-related symptoms.
methodsIn silico analysis was performed to explore the molecular interactions of atropine in controlling myopia and DED. The target lists for atropine, myopia, and DED were sourced from six public databases. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analyses identified common and unique pathways. A protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was created and analysed using Cytoscape to identify hub genes using six ranking algorithms. Targets were stratified into shared Class I and myopia-prioritised Class II categories by integrating retinal and pan-ocular expression data. Molecular docking and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were conducted to assess the binding affinities of atropine to prioritised targets.
resultsA total of 57 shared Class I and 19 Class II myopia-prioritised targets were identified; 19 hub genes were consistently ranked across the six algorithms. Class I targets converge on inflammatory and extracellular-matrix-remodelling pathways. Evidence of ocular expression supports the biological relevance of the prioritised targets in both classes. Docking showed favourable atropine binding to representative Class I targets (EGFR, MMP2, MMP9, and MAPK1) and Class II candidates (PIK3R1 and AKR1B1). MD simulations supported stable complexes for eight atropine-target pairs, with MM-PBSA binding free energy estimates supporting the computational prioritisation.
conclusionsShared Class I targets may potentially link the effects of atropine on both myopia control and DED, along with Class II targets specific to myopia, thereby generating testable hypotheses regarding the dual ocular effects of atropine and informing future mechanistic and translational studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.