ArticleJournal of translational medicine2026
The expression landscape and clinical significance of cancer-specific RNA transcripts across human cancers.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTranscript-level analyses allow for the precise characterization of gene expression and its functional role in cancer. However, most of these studies rely on reanalyses of next-generation sequencing data, whose incomplete or inaccurate assemblies limit the comprehensive and faithful characterization of transcripts. To systematically elucidate transcriptomic expression in tumors and define broadly applicable therapeutic strategies, we investigated cancer-specific RNA transcripts (cancer-SRTs) expressed across multiple cancer types based on long-read sequencing data.
methodsWe characterized the expression profiles of 44,405 cancer-SRTs across multiple cancer types using t-SNE and correlation analyses. Transcripts expressed in more than 10 cancer types were further investigated through enrichment, survival, and correlation analyses to elucidate their functions and clinical relevance. To explore the mechanisms driving cancer-SRT generation, we analyzed alternative splicing events within these transcripts and integrated copy number variation, DNA methylation, and ATAC-seq data from matched TCGA tumor samples. Using the expression of 131 transcripts strongly associated with tumor hallmarks, we developed a risk-score model to evaluate associations with patient survival, tumor stage, immune characteristics, and responses to immune checkpoint blockade. Finally, the in vitro anti-tumor effects of siRNAs targeting two cancer-SRTs were evaluated using CCK-8 assay, colony formation, and transwell assays.
resultsCancer-SRTs exhibit substantial structural diversity and are enriched in malignancy-associated pathways. The expression of these transcripts is associated with multiple genomic and epigenetic processes. We identify 131 transcripts that are strongly associated with tumor hallmarks and develop a risk-score model for evaluating patient prognosis and tumor progression. The model also exhibited strong associations with features of immune evasion.
conclusionsCancer-SRTs are widely expressed yet highly heterogeneous across tumor types, and are subject to multiple regulatory mechanisms underlying their functional and clinical significance. These findings advance our understanding of tumor biology and lay the groundwork for developing diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic strategies based on these transcripts. Future studies investigating their underlying mechanisms and applications in immunotherapy will be critical for precision cancer treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.