ArticleBMC nursing2026
Pelvic floor rehabilitation management in females with stress urinary incontinence: a summary of best-evidence strategies.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe current evidence on pelvic floor rehabilitation management for females with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is diverse and complex, and standardized pelvic floor rehabilitation protocols are lacking. The study aimed to retrieve and summarize the evidence related to pelvic floor rehabilitation management in females who experience SUI and provide guidance for healthcare workers.
methodsFollowing the 6S evidence resource pyramid model, two researchers searched the computer decision support system, guidelines networks, urological professional society websites, obstetrics and gynecology professional society websites, and related databases from top to bottom and collected the best clinical practice information books, clinical decision-making, recommendation practice, evidence summaries, guidelines, systematic reviews, and expert consensuses on the management of pelvic floor rehabilitation in females suffering SUI. The searches were carried out from database inception to September 2022. Literature quality was independently assessed by two researchers, and evidence was then obtained and summarized from eligible studies.
resultsForty-eight studies were eligible to be included, comprising 1 best clinical practice information book, 4 clinical decision-making, 3 recommended practices, 10 evidence summaries, 8 guidelines, 18 systematic reviews, and 4 expert consensus studies. Best-evidence strategies summarized the evidence for pelvic floor rehabilitation management in females with SUI, which included a total of 51 recommendations in 5 aspects: screening and assessment, lifestyle management, pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT), follow-up, and health education.
conclusionThe review summarized 51 best-evidence strategies for pelvic floor rehabilitation management in females with SUI. To ensure clinical efficacy and improve nursing quality, these strategies should be integrated into structured, multidisciplinary clinical pathways, carefully tailored to specific patient contexts and local healthcare resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.