ArticleBMC nursing2026
Moral leadership in neonatal nursing: a qualitative narrative study of ethical decision-making in NICUs.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNeonatal intensive care units (NICUs) concentrate ethically complex decision-making, yet the leadership behaviours supporting nurses' ethical agency remain insufficiently understood, particularly outside Western contexts.
aimTo explore how moral leadership is experienced and enacted in shaping ethical decision-making among NICU nurses.
designQualitative narrative inquiry, reported in accordance with COREQ and SRQR.
methodsTwenty-four registered nurses were recruited through purposive maximum-variation sampling across four Level III NICUs in northern Saudi Arabia. Narrative interviews (52-97 min; mean ≈ 74 min) were conducted over an eight-month period, from June 2025 to January 2026, and analysed using a narrative analysis approach integrating thematic and structural elements. Trustworthiness was supported through participant review of narrative summaries (14 of 24 participants provided substantive feedback), peer debriefing, reflexive journaling, and inter-coder agreement (κ = 0.83).
resultsFive themes and 15 subthemes were identified. Moral recognition was narrated as active, affectively mediated, and culturally embedded. A recurrent gap between moral judgment and moral action was attributed to hierarchical suppression of nursing voice and limited psychological safety. Servant leadership behaviours, empathic listening, moral mentoring, and ethical role modelling, as cumulative relational formation, functioned as moral scaffolding enabling ethical voice and action. Three emergent subthemes extended the framework: ethical role modelling as identity-level formation, spiritually grounded motivation rooted in Islamic accountability, and culturally sanctioned disclosure silence as a source of moral dissonance.
conclusionMoral leadership in Saudi NICUs is a relational, contextually conditioned practice shaped by leadership behaviours, institutional structures, and cultural frameworks. Strengthening ethical infrastructure through leadership development, nurse-accessible ethics support, and competency frameworks embedding moral leadership as a professional standard is a priority for neonatal nursing in Saudi Arabia and comparable settings. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.