Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42324479›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2026

The 'Nature Impact' feasibility study protocol: a mixed methods feasibility study of a group- and nature-based health intervention for adults experiencing mild to moderate anxiety, depression and/or stress.

Signe Salanson Jensen-Smidt, Louise Sofia Madsen, Lisa Gregersen Oestergaard, Dorthe Varning Poulsen, Knud Ryom, Nanna Holt Jessen

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06981000 (A Feasibility Study of Locally Adapted Nature-based Health Interventions for People With Mild to Moderate Anxiety, Depression and Stress), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06981000 nacompletednot on this map

A Feasibility Study of Locally Adapted Nature-based Health Interventions for People With Mild to Moderate Anxiety, Depression and Stress

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of CopenhagenRan2025 to 2026Enrolled120ConditionsAnxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Depression - Major Depressive Disorder, Depressive DisorderArmsLocally adapted nature-based health intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Signe Salanson Jensen-SmidtResearch Unit for General Practice, Aarhus, Denmark. sjs@ph.au.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-2471-4945
Louise Sofia MadsenDEFACTUM, Aarhus, Central Denmark Region, Denmark.
Lisa Gregersen OestergaardDEFACTUM, Aarhus, Central Denmark Region, Denmark.
Dorthe Varning PoulsenDepartment of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Knud RyomDepartment of Public Health, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark.
Nanna Holt JessenResearch Unit for General Practice, Aarhus, Denmark.

Funding

15. Juni Fonden 2023-0651
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnxiety, depression and stress-related conditions are prevalent and growing public health challenges, impacting individuals' quality of life and placing significant strain on healthcare systems globally. These complex conditions rarely respond to a single mode of treatment, underscoring the importance of diverse and complementary approaches. Nature-based health interventions (NBHIs) represent one such perspective, offering novel opportunities to address mental health by engaging with natural environments. While international interest in NBHIs is growing, evidence on how these interventions can be systematically developed and implemented remains limited. The aim of this study protocol is to report the planned Nature Impact Feasibility Study.

methodsThe Nature Impact Feasibility Study is a one-armed, mixed methods feasibility study aiming to evaluate a complex, group-based NBHI developed using the Medical Research Council framework for complex interventions. The intervention will be conducted across three sites in Denmark: Glostrup outpatient clinic, Kolding and Silkeborg municipality centres. The intervention consists of group-based NBHI programmes delivered weekly over 10 consecutive weeks, facilitated by experienced health professionals. The feasibility evaluation will examine three core domains. These include (1) the implementation process, including fidelity, dose, reach, adaptations and acceptability; (2) mechanisms of change and (3) contextual factors influencing implementation and intervention processes. Data will be collected through participant observations, focus group interviews, registration forms and participant questionnaires assessing mental health outcomes and the participants' relationship to nature. Data will be analysed using a mixed methods convergent design. Quantitative and qualitative data will be analysed separately and then integrated thematically during interpretation. DISCUSSION: By reporting the study protocol for the Nature Impact Feasibility Study in advance, the project enhances transparency, allows for critical appraisal of the planned design and methods and strengthens the foundation for the subsequent feasibility evaluation and future large-scale trials. The Nature Impact Feasibility Study will provide valuable insight into delivering NBHIs for adults experiencing mild to moderate anxiety, depression and/or stress, while informing intervention refinement, outcome measures and future research aimed at investigating the potential of integrating NBHIs into existing practices for treating anxiety, depression and stress.

trial registrationNCT06981000. Registered on March 13, 2025.

Indexed as

Complex interventionsFeasibility studyMental healthMixed methodsNature-based health interventionsProtocol

Identifiers

PMID42324479
PMCPMC13536583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.