ReviewOdontology2026
Endodontic filling material extrusion into the maxillary sinus: clinical presentation, microbiology, management, and outcomes-a systematic review.
Review in Odontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review aimed to consolidate the clinical presentation, diagnostic and microbial findings, management approaches, and outcomes of maxillary sinus involvement caused by extruded endodontic filling materials. Searches were performed in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and ProQuest up to August 2025. Observational studies reporting extrusion of filling material into the maxillary sinus, accompanied by clinical, imaging, and/or surgical descriptions, were included. Study quality was critically analyzed using the Joanna Briggs Institute tools. Of 4076 articles initially retrieved, 52 were selected for full-text reading, 39 met the inclusion criteria and were included, comprising 34 case reports and 5 case series. Maxillary first molars were the most frequently involved teeth (59%). Extrusion occurred predominantly during primary endodontic treatment. Filling material was identified in the left maxillary sinus in 21 cases (47%) and in the right maxillary sinus in 24 cases (53%). Clinical presentations ranged from incidental asymptomatic findings to severe manifestations such as acute sinusitis. In the included studies, diagnosis was established using radiographic and tomographic imaging as well as direct endoscopic evaluation. Surgical removal represented the most common definitive management approach. Clinical outcomes were predominantly favorable, with complete symptom resolution and functional recovery. Extrusion of endodontic filling materials into maxillary sinus most often involves maxillary first molars and is associated with clinically significant complications, particularly fungal sinusitis. The present findings emphasize the need for prevention, accurate diagnosis, and timely interdisciplinary care of this iatrogenic event.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42324439What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.