ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Synergistic effects of robot-assisted surgery and enhanced recovery after surgery protocols on outcomes of femoral neck fracture fixation: a comparative cohort study.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Robot-assisted versus freehand cannulated-screw fixation for femoral neck fractures: a systematic review of technical, clinical and adoption outcomes.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the synergistic effects of robotic-assisted (RA) technology and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols on the surgical quality and clinical outcomes of femoral neck fracture (FNF) fixation. A total of 226 patients who underwent cannulated compression screw fixation for FNF were retrospectively analyzed and categorized into four groups: Freehand surgery with Routine Orthopedic Care (FH + ROC, n = 60), Freehand surgery with ERAS (FH+ERAS, n = 57), Robot-assisted surgery with ROC (RA + ROC, n = 57), and RA+ERAS (n = 52). Perioperative data, radiological accuracy, pain scores, functional recovery, and complication rates were compared. The RA group demonstrated superior intraoperative performance, with significantly less blood loss, fewer fluoroscopy exposures, and fewer guide needle adjustments compared to the FH groups. Radiographic analysis confirmed that the RA group achieved the highest screw placement accuracy. Regarding clinical outcomes, both ERAS groups showed significantly lower postoperative VAS scores and complication rates compared to the ROC group. Notably, the RA+ERAS group achieved the optimal functional recovery, with the highest Harris Hip Scores and the shortest full weight-bearing time, significantly outperforming other groups. The combined application of RA and ERAS is a reliable method for treating FNFs with cannulated screws. It significantly outperforms FH and ROC in terms of screw placement accuracy, postoperative recovery, and functional recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42324410What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.