ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2026
Reward-based prioritization and perceptual feature effects on attentional flexibility in working memory.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The focus of attention (FoA) is a resource within working memory (WM) assumed to hold limited information in a highly accessible state. Recent evidence suggests the FoA can flexibly adjust to hold early, middle, or terminal memory representations in a highly active state with adequate motivation. When a high-reward item is present, the FoA can be redirected to flexibly adjust and select prioritized items, leading to improved performance. This has been termed the prioritization effect. This finding has been demonstrated across prior investigations that have consistently used the color red to indicate the high-reward stimulus. The salience of the stimulus may alternatively explain the prioritization effect in that the salient item may have an easier time entering WM. Salience could influence memory performance through better encoding. The current study aims to test the effect of feature-based confounds (pop-out effect) on reward-based prioritization by using a probe-recognition task and alternating the color of the to-be-prioritized item. Four colors (red, green, blue, magenta) were used, and the color assigned to a higher point-value was randomized between subjects. Our results showed that the prioritization effect was still evident even when salience (pop-out) was controlled. Regardless of the color used there was a performance benefit for the prioritized list position. Comparisons with prior studies indicate that visual pop-out, while not necessary for prioritization, may help facilitate stronger reward effects. Raw trial-level data, statistical analysis, and task code are available in the Open Science Framework (OSF) repository ( https://osf.io/xsc34/overview ). The experiment was not preregistered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.