Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42324391›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2026

Independent associations of MGMT promoter methylation and TERT promoter mutation with overall survival in glioblastoma: a single-center retrospective cohort study.

Akın Cengiz, Serhat Yıldızhan, Usame Rakip, İhsan Canbek, Mehmet Gazi Boyacı, Semiha Orhan, Adem Aslan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Akın CengizDepartment of Neurosurgery, Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8798-6495
Serhat YıldızhanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9394-5828
Usame RakipDepartment of Neurosurgery, Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey. usamerakip@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7494-0335
İhsan CanbekDepartment of Neurosurgery, Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7740-196X
Mehmet Gazi BoyacıDepartment of Neurosurgery, Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7329-2102
Semiha OrhanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2617-6197
Adem AslanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9432-5399

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlioblastomas (World Health Organization [WHO] grade 4) are the most lethal primary brain tumors, with a median overall survival (OS) of 12-15 months despite multimodal treatment. MGMT promoter methylation and TERT promoter mutations are key prognostic biomarkers, but their combined utility remains incompletely defined. This study evaluated the prognostic effects of MGMT methylation, TERT mutations, and adjuvant treatment.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 65 patients with gliomas treated between January 2013 and December 2024, with primary analyses restricted to WHO grade 4 tumors (n = 54). MGMT methylation was assessed by methylation-specific PCR and TERT mutations (C228T/C250T) by Sanger sequencing. Survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods and multivariable Cox regression with bootstrap validation.

resultsIn the grade 4 cohort, median OS was 12.7 months. MGMT methylation was present in 50.0% and TERT mutations in 68.5%. MGMT methylation independently predicted improved survival (aHR 0.45, 95% CI 0.24-0.87, p = 0.018), while TERT mutation predicted worse survival (aHR 2.93, 95% CI 1.46-5.87, p = 0.003). Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy was associated with improved OS (aHR 0.44, 95% CI 0.24-0.81, p = 0.008). Combined stratification identified four prognostic subgroups, with MGMT-methylated/TERT-wild-type patients showing the longest survival (median OS 19.0 months). The model demonstrated acceptable discrimination (C-index 0.697).

conclusionsMGMT methylation and TERT mutations are independent prognostic markers in glioblastoma. This study provides real-world evidence that both biomarkers retain prognostic value after adjustment for adjuvant treatment within an internally validated model. Combined MGMT/TERT assessment provides clinically meaningful four-tier risk stratification and supports routine prognostic evaluation.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesGlioblastomaTelomeraseTumor Suppressor ProteinsAdultAgedDNA MethylationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutationPrognosisPromoter Regions, GeneticDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesMGMT protein, humanTelomeraseTERT protein, humanTumor Suppressor ProteinsGlioblastomaMGMT promoter methylationOverall survivalPrognostic stratificationTERT promoter mutationWHO grade 4 glioma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.