ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
HRRT: hierarchical reinforcement learning for renal replacement therapy decision support.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Renal replacement therapy (RRT) is a critical intervention for patients with acute kidney injury (AKI). However, clinical decision-making regarding the timing of initiation, modality selection, optimal ultrafiltration rate, and weaning criteria remains highly complex and exhibits significant practice variation. Current RCTs fail to guide adaptive strategies, leaving dynamic decision-making heavily reliant on empirical experience. Consequently, a substantial gap persists in dynamically adjusting treatment in response to patient-specific clinical progression. We conducted a retrospective multi-center study to develop Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning for Renal Replacement Therapy (HRRT), a holistic clinical decision support system (CDSS) that covers the full decision-making process in RRT. 2467 Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stays of 1439 patients from a US hospital were used for training and internal testing. The model's performance was evaluated on two external validation sets, where we selected 1085 ICU stays of 1085 patients from Netherlands and 1230 stays of 845 patients from China. The estimated mortality rate decreased by 6.1 percentage points from 47.7% (95% CI: 45.2-50.0) to 41.6% (95% CI: 35.6-47.2) compared to clinician-led outcomes. These findings imply that an AI-driven, holistic approach to RRT can reduce inappropriate practice variation and lower ICU mortality by recommending personalized treatment adjustments.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.