ArticleScientific reports2026
Prediction of physicochemical properties of organic compounds using degree-based topological indices and machine learning models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents a quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR) framework that integrates graph theory with machine learning to predict key physicochemical properties of diverse organic compounds. A data set of 275 structurally diverse organic compounds, including alkanes, alkenes, alkynes, cyclic systems, and aromatic hydrocarbons-was represented as molecular graphs, and their topological features were encoded using two complementary degree-based indices: the Sombor index (SO) and the Modified inverse degree index (ID). These indices were employed to model the octanol-water partition coefficient (LogP), calculated LogP (CLogP), molar refractivity (MR), and critical pressure (CP). Linear regression established baseline correlations, while Random Forest and XGBoost regression models were implemented to capture nonlinear relationships and enhance predictive accuracy. Models were evaluated using a 70%/30% train-test split and five-fold cross-validation. The predicted values show good correlation with Actual values. Machine learning models are outperforming than linear regression. XGBoost has the highest prediction performance for all properties, with a best [Formula: see text] value larger than 0.97. Well-chosen topological indices and machine learning models, provide a highly efficient and effective way to predict the physicochemical properties of organic compounds with diverse scaffolds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.