ArticleScientific reports2026
Clinical pathways matter for multimodal deep learning in early Alzheimer's disease detection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Identifying individuals at risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD), particularly in the preclinical and early stages, remains challenging. Although deep learning approaches based on structural MRI show promise as a non-invasive biomarker, existing multimodal models require task-specific training and depend on biomarkers that are not routinely available in clinical practice. Here, we propose a zero-shot multimodal feature extraction framework based on SigLIP that combines structural MRI embeddings with text embeddings of routinely collected clinical variables for early AD risk stratification in individuals at preclinical or mild cognitive impairment (MCI) stages. We evaluated the approach in 416 individuals from the ADNI cohort (age: 72.73 ± 6.7). SigLIP was used without fine-tuning to extract MRI and clinical text embeddings, which were combined into multimodal representations for individual-level AD risk prediction within 4 years. We further compared the model performance in a single-visit and two-visit settings to assess the value of longitudinal information and framework scalability. In the 1-visit setting, combining MRI embeddings with MMSE, age, and sex achieved an AUC of 0.91 ± 0.02, showing higher performance than the CSF Aβ42-based model (AUC 0.73 ± 0.08) and MMSE-based model (AUC 0.85 ± 0.22). In the 2-visit setting, performance was maintained or improved, supporting the scalability of the approach to longitudinal data. These findings suggest that multimodal fusion of SigLIP-derived MRI features and routinely collected clinical variables may provide a practical and scalable strategy for early AD risk progression prediction without task-specific training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.