ArticleScientific reports2026
Metaheuristic-optimized interaction-aware deep learning with large language model assistance for data-driven water quality prediction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate prediction of water-quality indicators remains challenging in small tabular environmental datasets because physicochemical variables can exhibit nonlinear interdependencies and modern deep-learning models are sensitive to hyperparameter configuration. In this study, the supervised regression task is defined as predicting dissolved oxygen (mg/L) from the remaining measured physicochemical variables using a modest public dataset of 200 samples. To address this task, the Automatic Feature Interaction Network (AutoInt) is coupled with the Ninja Optimization Algorithm (NiOA) for wrapper-based hyperparameter optimization under a controlled and reproducible experimental protocol. All evaluations use a fixed train/validation/test split (70%/15%/15%) with leakage-safe preprocessing based only on training-set statistics, and results are aggregated over [Formula: see text] independent runs with controlled initialization seeds and mean ± standard deviation reporting. Baseline AutoInt without metaheuristic optimization achieves a mean squared error of [Formula: see text], whereas the NiOA-optimized AutoInt configuration reaches [Formula: see text] under the matched optimization budget of 1500 function evaluations ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]). These findings indicate that NiOA-guided hyperparameter tuning can substantially improve AutoInt performance within this fixed benchmark setting. However, because the dataset is small, cross-sectional, and lacks explicit spatial or temporal structure, the results should be interpreted as benchmark-specific evidence rather than broad operational validation. Further evaluation on larger, independent, and spatiotemporally diverse water-quality datasets is required before generalizing the fitted model to wider environmental monitoring or decision-support applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.