ArticleScientific reports2026
Anthropometrics, physical fitness, and sport-specific performance of young German canoe sprint athletes (U13-U17) to predict senior performance level: a machine-learning approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate whether machine learning models comprising anthropometric, physical fitness, and sport-specific performance data from young canoe sprint athletes can predict their senior performance level (SPL). Between 1992 and 2019, anthropometric (e.g. body mass/height), physical fitness (e.g. 800 m/1500 m run, 2 min bench press/pull), and sport-specific performance (e.g. 250 m/2000 m on-water canoe sprint) data as well as age (i.e. U13 to U16) and sport discipline were annually examined in young male and female canoe sprint athletes (n = 729, male: 495, female: 234). A benchmark experiment was conducted to evaluate and compare multiple classification models and to use the final model to predict SPL (national vs. international) on three validation datasets (n = 103, U13 to U17, 2021 to 2023) with ground-truth labels from 2025. Findings revealed that an XGBoost model achieved acceptable discrimination (AUC = 0.81) and balanced accuracy (BACC = 0.73) for predicting SPL in young canoe sprint athletes. However, precision for the international class was low (PRAUC = 0.35, PPV = 0.20), indicating many false-positive international predictions. The most important feature was 2000 m on-water canoe sprint test. Furthermore, predictions on the three external validation datasets showed limited temporal generalizability, with moderate discrimination (AUC: 0.68 to 0.73), modest but consistently above-chance balanced accuracy (BACC: 0.59 to 0.63), and moderate but variable sensitivity (0.20 to 0.67). However, precision for identifying international athletes was low across the external validation datasets, indicating a high false-positive rate. Therefore, the model should be interpreted as an acceptable screening tool. However, low precision and variable sensitivity limit its practical utility as a stand alone selection instrument. The present findings may help practitioners involved in talent selection and development in Olympic canoe sprinting and may inform the development of future prediction models for young canoeists based on anthropometric, physical fitness, and sport-specific performance data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.