Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42324311›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Quantitative estimation and interpretation of non-technical loss severity in smart grids using RFE-optimized XGBoost regression.

Vahid Parvaz, Jabbar Ganji

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Vahid ParvazDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Mahshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mahshahr, Iran. Vahid.Parvaz7@gmail.com.
Jabbar GanjiDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Mahshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mahshahr, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-technical losses (NTL) remain a major source of economic risk for electricity distribution utilities. Although extensive research has focused on classification-based theft detection, such approaches typically provide binary decisions and offer limited support for quantifying the magnitude of consumption irregularities, which is essential for inspection prioritization and financial planning. This study proposes a regression-driven framework to estimate the severity of deviation from expected demand behavior using the Cumulative Abnormal Deviation (CAD) index. Instead of attempting theft verification, the method provides a continuous risk indicator derived from the difference between measured consumption and a baseline demand model. The framework combines Extreme Gradient Boosting with Recursive Feature Elimination to construct a compact predictor while preserving feature interpretability. Experiments conducted on a publicly available smart-meter dataset demonstrate that the optimized XGBoost-RFE model achieves high predictive consistency (R² = 0.9869, RMSE = 2.4062, MAE = 1.1285) and outperforms ensemble and deep learning benchmarks under identical data conditions. Residual-based prediction intervals show stable uncertainty behavior, with 93.83% of observations captured within the nominal 95% confidence bounds. Feature-attribution analysis indicates that load-related variables dominate deviation formation, supporting the operational plausibility of the model outputs. The results suggest that reliable estimation of deviation severity can be achieved under the evaluated experimental conditions without direct access to inspection outcomes. Nevertheless, the framework should be interpreted as a decision-support and prioritization tool, not as proof of theft. The proposed methodology provides a statistically grounded step toward quantitative, explainable, and practically applicable NTL risk assessment in modern distribution systems.

Indexed as

Electricity TheftHigh-Precision RegressionInterpretabilityNon-Technical Loss QuantificationPrediction Interval (PI)Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE)

Identifiers

PMID42324311
PMCPMC13562541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.