ArticleScientific reports2026
Machine learning-based prediction model for long-term mortality after ischemic stroke.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stroke, a leading cause of death, requires precise predictions of life expectancy. Traditional scores focused on short-term outcomes and required labor-intensive data collection. Recent machine learning (ML)-based prediction models showed superior performance. However, they were predominantly geared towards classification tasks, omitting crucial temporal aspects. Thus, an unmet need arises for more convenient, time-aware predictive methodologies for long-term mortality in managing acute stroke patients. The developmental cohort consisted of 3,411 patients from two tertiary hospitals, while the external test cohort included 502 patients from a secondary cardiovascular center. We developed various ML- and deep learning (DL)-based models to predict post-ischemic stroke mortality, utilizing clinical data. Among these, we selected the best-performing model and compared it with traditional risk scores. Furthermore, we assessed key features based on their importance, determining their optimal number for practical application. The total number of deceased patients in the developmental cohort was 136, and 118 in the external test cohort. The Gradient Boosting Cox Proportional Hazards model demonstrated the best performance with C-index of 0.785 in internal validation set, and C-index of 0.845 in external test set. It surpassed the conventional risk score, PREMISE score with C-index of 0.783(p = 0.017) in the external dataset. The key features included age, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, hemoglobin, and so on. The study developed and validated a machine learning-based model tailored for post-stroke survival prediction, outperforming existing scores. It could enhance the individual stroke patient's survival predictions and optimize medical resource allocation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.