Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42324257›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Attention modulates value normalization in human reinforcement learning by shaping reward encoding.

Romane Cecchi, Sebastian Gluth, Stefano Palminteri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Romane CecchiLaboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives et Computationnelles, Département d'Études Cognitives, École Normale Supérieure, Université Paris Sciences et Lettres, INSERM U960, Paris, France. romane.cecchi@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6149-939X
Sebastian GluthDepartment of Psychology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2241-5103
Stefano PalminteriLaboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives et Computationnelles, Département d'Études Cognitives, École Normale Supérieure, Université Paris Sciences et Lettres, INSERM U960, Paris, France. stefano.palminteri@ens.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contextual valuation is a well-documented phenomenon in reinforcement learning, typically manifesting as range normalization in outcome representation. However, recent findings have revealed systematic deviations from this model, particularly when three options with equally spaced values are presented. In this study, we hypothesize that these distortions in outcome normalization arise from attentional processes. To test this, we conduct three experiments with 105 participants in total while simultaneously tracking their gaze position with eye-tracking. Furthermore, we systematically manipulate attention using both top-down and bottom-up approaches. These manipulations significantly increase the subjective valuation of attended options, supporting a causal role of attention in shaping value representation. To account for these effects, we develop a reinforcement learning model that integrates attentional mechanisms, wherein gaze duration directly modulates the absolute value of options prior to range normalization. This attentional range model outperforms attention-free and choice-repetition alternatives, underscoring the critical influence of attention in value computation.

Indexed as

AttentionReinforcement, PsychologyRewardAdultChoice BehaviorEye MovementsEye-Tracking TechnologyFemaleHumansLearningMaleReinforcement Machine LearningYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42324257
PMCPMC13439065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.