Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42324255›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Preclinical evaluation of the newly developed carina platform in robotic-assisted proctectomy with porcine and cadaveric models.

Yifei Feng, Junwei Tang, Yi Zhang, Dongsheng Zhang, Wenbin Zhou, Li Li, Yueming Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yifei FengDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Junwei TangDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Yi ZhangDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Dongsheng ZhangDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Wenbin ZhouRonovo Surgical, Shanghai, China.
Li LiRonovo Surgical, Shanghai, China.
Yueming SunDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China. sunyueming@njmu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery has made progress in addressing many of the technical challenges associated with conventional laparoscopy. Recently, a new robotic surgical system, Carina Platform, has been developed. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and safety of Carina for proctectomy surgery in preclinical models. Port and cart positions were initially determined by surgical simulation based on three-dimensional reconstruction. Six pigs, divided equally into acute and chronic groups, underwent robotic-assisted proctectomy using the Carina robotic system. Operative time, device errors and perioperative complications were recorded. All animals were observed postoperatively to assess their mental status, and after four weeks, the chronic pigs were euthanized for necropsy to evaluate the recovery of the anastomotic stoma. The optimal port and patient cart positions were further assessed in three human cadavers. Robotic-assisted proctectomy was successfully completed in all porcine subjects. No device-related intraoperative complications were observed. An autopsy examination revealed that the chronic pigs, which had been followed up for 28 days, had made a favorable recovery. The configurations of ports and patient carts were successfully validated in human cadaver models that could simulate the completion of a rectal resection. The feasibility and safety of the newly developed Carina robotic system for performing proctectomy were successfully demonstrated in porcine and cadaveric models. Further studies are required to validate its clinical application in human patients.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyProctectomyRobotic Surgical ProceduresAnimalsCadaverFemaleHumansModels, AnimalOperative TimeRectumSwineCarina PlatformPreclinical modelsRobotic-assisted proctectomyThree-dimensional reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID42324255
PMCPMC13562625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.