ArticleZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2026
[Expert consensus on reconstruction treatment for irreparable posterosuperior massive rotator cuff tears].
Article in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Irreparable posterosuperior massive rotator cuff tears represent a common and challenging condition in shoulder surgery. Reconstruction procedures can effectively restore the anatomical structure and function of the shoulder joint and, as an important joint-preserving treatment option for irreparable posterosuperior massive rotator cuff tears, have garnered increasing attention and application among shoulder surgeons. However, a lack of consensus currently exists regarding its definition, diagnostic criteria, and treatment strategies, leading to inconveniences in clinical decision-making and academic communication. To standardize the indications, surgical option selection, and postoperative rehabilitation strategies for the reconstruction of irreparable posterosuperior massive rotator cuff tears, the Shoulder Joint Study Group of the Fifth Committee of the Chinese Society of Sports Medicine of Chinese Medical Association organized experts in the relevant field to develop a consensus using a modified Delphi method, which involved two rounds of questionnaire surveys and one online expert meeting. After reviewing domestic and foreign literature, the consensus drafting group compiled the initial draft and questionnaire items. Suitable topics were selected via the first round of expert voting, and the recognition level of responses to each consensus question was determined in the second round. Online expert discussions were subsequently held to refine wording and reconcile divergent views, yielding the final consensus. A consensus is confirmed with an approval rate of no less than 85%. It is classified into three tiers: high consensus (95.0%-100%), general consensus (90.0%-94.9%), and basic consensus (85.0%-89.9%). This consensus ultimately formulated 10 recommendations focusing on core issues, including the definition and diagnosis of irreparable posterosuperior massive rotator cuff tears, the indications and timing of reconstruction surgery, the selection and application principles of commonly used reconstruction techniques, perioperative management and phased rehabilitation protocols, and the prevention and treatment of postoperative complications. This consensus aims to provide a clinical decision-making reference for orthopedic surgeons, sports medicine physicians, and rehabilitation specialists, thereby promoting the standardization and individualization of reconstruction treatment for irreparable massive rotator cuff tears and improving patient functional outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.