ArticleThe Journal of reproduction and development2026
Automated precise recognition of ovine embryo microscopic images using a boundary-enhanced deep learning network.
Article in The Journal of reproduction and development, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Efficient selection of in vitro-fertilized embryos is crucial for assisted reproduction in sheep, and automated microscopic analysis can enable objective evaluation. Instance segmentation is a key prerequisite for extracting downstream morphological and morphokinetic indicators. However, ovine embryo microscopic images typically exhibit abundant cytoplasmic lipid droplets and tightly packed blastomeres, causing conventional segmentation methods to fail when cell boundaries are faint. Here, we developed a boundary-enhanced deep learning network (BE-DFNet) to address high-density cell adhesion. By introducing a boundary stream as a structural prior to focus on cell-cell contact interfaces, the model was validated on 847 2D brightfield images covering the early cleavage stages (from 1-cell to 16-cell). We specifically focused on these stages because they provide critical morphokinetic indicators (e.g., t2 to t8) before significant blastomere overlapping in the compacted morula stage physically limits the reliability of 2D instance segmentation. BE-DFNet achieved a panoptic quality of 0.5088, outperforming a representative state-of-the-art method, Cellpose-SAM (0.4323). Notably, BE-DFNet reduced endpoint error, which reflects topological consistency, from 1.6265 to 0.4632, indicating improved separation of adhered blastomeres. Collectively, BE-DFNet effectively mitigates cytoplasmic texture interference and ensures the high-precision topological reconstruction of blastomere boundaries, providing a reliable foundation for fully automated morphokinetic grading.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.