Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42324086›Full record

GuidelineContact dermatitis2026

European Society of Contact Dermatitis Guideline for Diagnostic Patch Testing-Recommendations on Best Practice (Update 2026).

Wolfgang Uter, Olivier Aerts, Tove Agner, Richard Brans, Magnus Bruze, Alicia Cannavó, Marie-Noёlle Crépy, Ana M Giménez-Arnau, Margarida Gonçalo, An Goossens and 14 more

Abstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Contact dermatitis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Wolfgang UterDepartment of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen/Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4498-3710
Olivier AertsUniversity Hospital Antwerp (UZA) and University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0076-2887
Tove AgnerDepartment of Dermatology, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7543-8299
Richard BransInstitute for Interdisciplinary Dermatologic Prevention and Rehabilitation (iDerm), Osnabrück University, Osnabrück, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1245-024X
Magnus BruzeDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2919-3227
Alicia CannavóContact Dermatitis and Occupational Dermatoses, Hospital de Clínicas "José de San Martín", Buenos Aires University, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0135-3065
Marie-Noёlle CrépyDepartment of Occupational and Envionmental Diseases, University Hospital of Centre of Paris, Hotel-Dieu Hospital, AP-HP, and Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Centre of Paris, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1393-5692
Ana M Giménez-ArnauDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5434-7753
Margarida GonçaloClinic of Dermatology, University Hospital, Coimbra Local Health Unit and Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6842-1360
An GoossensFaculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven (KU Leuven), Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9805-3439
Swen M JohnInstitute for Interdisciplinary Dermatologic Prevention and Rehabilitation (iDerm), Osnabrück University, Osnabrück, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5406-9458
Carola LidénInstitute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9951-5896
Suzana Ljubojević HadžavdićDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, University of Zagreb School of Medicine, University Hospital Center Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3640-9567
Vera MahlerAllergology Division, Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Langen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6471-1811
Mihaly MaturaDepartment of Dermatology at Norrlands University Hospital Umeå, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9621-8537
Esen ÖzkayaDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9585-9509
Maria PesonenFinnish Institute of Occupational Health, Occupational Medicine, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0356-7064
Nadia Raison-PeyronDepartment of Dermatology, Montpellier University Hospital and Montpellier University, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7991-3165
Thomas RustemeyerDepartment of Dermatology-Allergology and Occupational Dermatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7580-0684
Radoslaw SpiewakDepartment of Experimental Dermatology and Cosmetology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland and Instytut Dermatologii, Krakow, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5968-0555
Luca StingeniSection of Dermatology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7919-8141
Ian R WhiteDepartment of Cutaneous Allergy, St. John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5048-4635
S Mark WilkinsonLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7253-3461
Jeanne Duus JohansenNational Allergy Research Centre, Department of Skin and Allergy, University of Copenhagen, Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3537-8463

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present guideline updates the initial ESCD patch testing guideline, summarizing all aspects of patch testing for the diagnosis of contact allergy in patients suspected of suffering, or having been suffering, from allergic contact dermatitis or other delayed-type hypersensitivity skin and mucosal conditions. Sections with brief descriptions and discussions of different pertinent topics are followed by highlighted short practical recommendations, which have been consensualized in a Delphi process. Topics comprise, after an introduction with important definitions, materials, technique, modifications of epicutaneous testing, individual factors influencing the patch test outcome or necessitating special considerations, children, patients with occupational contact dermatitis and drug eruptions as special groups, patch testing of materials brought in by the patient, adverse effects of patch testing and the final evaluation and patient counselling based on this judgement. Finally, short reference is made to aspects of (continuing) medical education and to electronic collection of data for epidemiological surveillance.

Indexed as

Dermatitis, Allergic ContactPatch TestsDermatitis, OccupationalEuropeHumanscontact allergyguidelinepatch testingreview

Identifiers

PMID42324086
PMCPMC13441402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.