ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2026
Comprehensive review and assessment of multi-species splicing variant prediction: task-specific deep learning models and genomic foundation models.
Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Alternative splicing generates transcriptomic and proteomic diversity essential for eukaryotic complexity, yet genetic variants disrupting the splicing code underlie numerous human diseases. Deep learning (DL) models and genomic foundation models (GFMs) have achieved outstanding accuracy for predicting splicing variant effects in humans. However, their transferability to non-human species remains poorly understood, limiting applications in agricultural genomics, comparative biology, and non-model organism research, where experimentally validated variant datasets are limited or lacking. In this study, we comprehensively reviewed 35 computational approaches in terms of their architectural characteristics for splicing site and variant prediction and analysis. We systematically benchmarked the performance of 10 representative models for splicing variant prediction across human, rat, pig, and chicken, including four task-specific DL models and six GFMs, using our manually assembled benchmark datasets. Our benchmarking results revealed a substantial cross-species performance decrease (~21%-33% in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve - AUROC) using task-specific models from human to non-human species datasets. We then applied a supervised adaptation to frozen GFM embeddings (DNABERT-2, Evo 2, Genos) by adding a lightweight classifier (i.e. a multi-layer perceptron) and reduced the cross-species performance decrease for rat and pig (8.56%-23.84% in AUROC), while performance on chicken was very close to human (decline within 1%, even exceeding by 0.52% when using the Evo 2 embedding). We proposed several directions to improve the prediction performance of splicing variants, including feature representation transfer and multi-modal fusion integrating global context, universal embeddings, and species-aware conditioning. We hope our comprehensive review and performance benchmarking can provide useful computational insights for further advancement of splicing variant prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.