ArticleBreast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)2026
Prognostic impact of progesterone receptor status in patients with breast cancer and isolated locoregional recurrence.
Article in Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe impact of progesterone receptor (PR) status on the prognosis of breast cancer after isolated locoregional recurrence (ILRR) remains unclear. This study assessed the prognostic impact of the PR status of ILRR tumors in patients with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer.
methodsThe study utilized data from the Japanese National Clinical Database (2004-2015), including 1,625 patients with ER+/HER2- ILRR. All participants were patients aged between 20 and 75 years at diagnosis who underwent curative surgery for ER+/HER2- primary breast cancer. Patients were classified into three groups based on the PR status of primary (p) and recurrent (r) tumors. We compared the overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) among the three groups using the Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test. ER and PR were considered positive if immunohistochemistry staining was positive in > 1% of tumor cells. For the ER expression levels in ILRR tumors, 1-10% were considered as ER-low positive.
resultsPatients with PR- ILRR (pPR-/rPR- and pPR+/rPR-) had significantly worse OS and BCSS than those with PR+ ILRR (pPR+/rPR+). Factors associated with worse outcomes included lymph node metastasis, a shorter disease-free interval, ER-low positivity, and no surgery for ILRR tumor.
conclusionsThis study highlights PR-negativity in ER+/HER2- ILRR tumors as a poor prognostic factor after ILRR, independent of the PR status of the primary breast cancer, emphasizing the need for tailored treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.