Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42323777›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2026

CT-based vascular invasion in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma compared with intraoperative and histological findings.

Gala Nacul Mora, Andreas Andreou, Ziad Maksoud, Felix Becker, Barbara Heitplatz, Eva Wardelmann, Benjamin Strücker, Shadi Katou, Haluk Morgül, Andreas Pascher and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Gala Nacul Mora *Department of Radiology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany. nabilagala.naculmora@ukmuenster.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-8991-170X
Andreas Andreou *Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Ziad MaksoudDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Felix BeckerDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Barbara HeitplatzDepartment of Pathology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Eva WardelmannDepartment of Pathology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Benjamin StrückerDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Shadi KatouDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Haluk MorgülDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Andreas PascherDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Michael KöhlerDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Gesa Helen PöhlerDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the concordance of CT-based radiological, surgical, and histopathological determination of vascular invasion in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). MATERIALS AND

methodsThis retrospective single-center study included 103 treatment-naive PDAC patients (median age 68 years, male 61%) with arterial-/portal venous-contrast enhanced CT undergoing successful primary resection. Three radiologists independently assessed tumor-vessel contact according to NCCN criteria. Radiological vascular invasion was operationally defined as > 180° or contour irregularity versus no invasion defined as no contact or contact ≤ 180° without contour irregularity, to compare to binary intraoperative and histological reference. Intraoperatively, venous and arterial invasion were defined as tumor adherence to or invasion of the vessel wall. Histopathologically, venous invasion (V0/1) was defined according to UICC-TNM. Additionally, as major arteries were not resected, microscopically seen periarterial perineural invasion (Pn

resultsMedian CT-to-surgery was 17 days (81% within 4 weeks). CT-based interobserver agreement was κ = 0.8 for venous, κ = 0.6 for arterial invasion determination. Intraoperatively, 35% patients showed venous, 5% arterial involvement. Histopathologically, 14% showed venous invasion, 3% Pn

conclusionNCCN-derived, threshold-based radiological venous invasion determination was similar to binary intraoperative and histopathological findings and decreased with longer CT-to-surgery intervals. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: NCCN-derived, threshold-based CT venous-invasion determination in PDAC is concordant with binary intraoperative and histopathological invasion, but depends on the selected threshold and decreases with longer CT-to-surgery interval, underlining the clinical need for standardized staging intervals in patients undergoing surgery. KEY POINTS: Comparison between CT vascular assessment and surgical/histopathological findings in PDAC remains highly complex, and current guidelines lack CT-to-surgery interval recommendations. Threshold-based CT venous invasion agreed moderately with surgery and strongly with histopathology, while CT-based arterial status correlated strongly with surgery, albeit in markedly low overall incidence. CT-vascular assessment precision decreases with longer time intervals, showing the need for establishing timeframes for preoperative imaging.

Indexed as

Neoplasm invasivenessPancreatic neoplasmsSensitivity and specificityTomography (X-ray computed)

Identifiers

PMID42323777
PMCPMC13283947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.