Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42323768›Full record

ArticleDiscover oncology2026

Toxicity outcomes of concurrent radiotherapy with adjuvant capecitabine in triple-negative breast cancer (TROD 06-24).

Volkan Demircan, Berrin Benli Yavuz, Bekir Hakan Bakkal, Sukran Celikarslan, Sule Karabulut Gul, Huseyin Tepetam, Didem Colpan Oksuz, Alaettin Arslan, Ayse Altinok

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Discover oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Volkan DemircanRadiation Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Goztepe Memorial Hospital, Bahcesehir University, Altunizade Mah. Sehit Erol Olcok Sok. No:7 Albayrak Sitesi B blok daire:18, Uskudar, Istanbul, Turkey. nvdemircan@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9632-180X
Berrin Benli YavuzRadiation Oncology Department, Necmettin Erbakan University Faculty of Medicine, Konya, Turkey.
Bekir Hakan BakkalRadiation Oncology Department, Bulent Ecevit University Faculty of Medicine, Zonguldak, Turkey.
Sukran CelikarslanRadiation Oncology Department, Koc University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Sule Karabulut GulRadiation Oncology Department, Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal City Hospital, Health Science University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Huseyin TepetamRadiation Oncology Department, Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal City Hospital, Health Science University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Didem Colpan OksuzCerrahpasa Medical Faculty Radiation Oncology Department, Istanbul, Turkey.
Alaettin ArslanRadiation Oncology Department, Kayseri City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ayse AltinokRadiation Oncology Department, Medipol Bahcelievler Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTriple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), the subtype with the poorest prognosis, shows treatment outcomes closely tied to the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with residual disease post-treatment face a higher recurrence risk. In this subgroup, adjuvant capecitabine has been shown to improve disease-free and overall survival. Although concurrent use of capecitabine and radiotherapy (RT) is considered safe in gastrointestinal cancers, data on its safety in breast cancer are limited. This study aimed to evaluate toxicity outcomes associated with concurrent capecitabine and RT in TNBC.

methodsThis retrospective multicenter study included 95 patients with TNBC treated with concurrent adjuvant capecitabine and RT between 2018 and 2024 across eight medical centers. Toxicity was graded according to CTCAE v5.0. Univariable comparisons were adjusted for multiple testing using the Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate. Multivariable analyses were performed using forward stepwise logistic regression for grade 2-3 dermatitis and Firth's penalized likelihood logistic regression for grade 3 dermatitis. Statistical analyses were performed using Jamovi 2.6.44, JASP 0.19.3, and Python 3.11.

resultsThe median follow-up was 25.3 months, and the median age was 49 years (range 29-81). Comorbidities were present in 33.7% of patients. RT was interrupted in 5.3% of patients; capecitabine was dose-reduced in 5 patients and discontinued in 2. Skin toxicity occurred in 86.3% of patients (grade 1, 44.2%; grade 2, 33.7%; grade 3, 8.4%), while 13.7% experienced no skin toxicity. Hematologic toxicity (any grade) was observed in 26.3% of patients and gastrointestinal toxicity in 8.4%, with no significant differences across skin toxicity strata. After multiplicity adjustment, clinical T3-4 stage, post-neoadjuvant ypT3-4 and ypN2-3 stage, and bolus application were significantly associated with higher-grade dermatitis (all q < 0.05). On multivariable analysis, advanced clinical T stage was the sole independent predictor of grade 2-3 dermatitis (OR 4.62, 95% CI 1.80-11.91, p = 0.002). For grade 3 dermatitis, Firth penalized regression identified total lymphatic irradiation (OR 9.93, p = 0.006) and bolus application (OR 7.08, p = 0.036) as independent predictors.

conclusionConcurrent capecitabine and RT in TNBC demonstrated a manageable acute toxicity profile in this retrospective multicenter cohort. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.

Indexed as

CapecitabineRadiotherapySide effectsToxicityTriple negative breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID42323768
PMCPMC13373112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.