Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42323689›Full record

Observational studyScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2026

Trends in urgency levels and risk of acute critical condition among prehospital patients. A seven-year observational historic register-based cohort study.

Kristine Sørensen, Torben Anders Kløjgård, Erika Frischknecht Christensen, Tim Alex Lindskou, Morten Breinholt Søvsø

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kristine SørensenCentre for Prehospital and Emergency Research at Danish Centre for Health Services Research, Aalborg University Hospital and Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Selma Lagerløfs Vej 249, Gistrup, 9220, Denmark. kristine.soerensen@rn.dk.
Torben Anders KløjgårdCentre for Prehospital and Emergency Research at Danish Centre for Health Services Research, Aalborg University Hospital and Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Selma Lagerløfs Vej 249, Gistrup, 9220, Denmark.
Erika Frischknecht ChristensenCentre for Prehospital and Emergency Research at Danish Centre for Health Services Research, Aalborg University Hospital and Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Selma Lagerløfs Vej 249, Gistrup, 9220, Denmark.
Tim Alex LindskouCentre for Prehospital and Emergency Research at Danish Centre for Health Services Research, Aalborg University Hospital and Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Selma Lagerløfs Vej 249, Gistrup, 9220, Denmark.
Morten Breinholt SøvsøCentre for Prehospital and Emergency Research at Danish Centre for Health Services Research, Aalborg University Hospital and Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Selma Lagerløfs Vej 249, Gistrup, 9220, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn our region, as in Western countries, the number of emergencies requesting an ambulance is increasing. Whether this may be due to increased disease burden and/or lower threshold for calling is not clear. This study aimed to examine the development over the years in the number and urgency levels of ambulances and the actual acute disease severity, as indicated by initial vital signs measured on scene, together with patient demographics, comorbidity, and mortality trends over time.

methodsWe conducted a registry-based observational cohort study of patients aged ≥ 18 years assigned an ambulance in the North Denmark Region from 2017 to 2023. The primary outcomes were urgency level and acute critical severity, assessed by a modified National Early Warning Score. Linear regression was applied to examine for alignment between trends in urgency level over the years and critically versus non-critically severity in prehospital patients assigned to urgency level A (most urgent, potentially life-threatening) and B (less urgent), respectively.

resultsAmong 202,746 prehospital patients, the proportion assessed as urgency level A decreased from 62% to 59%, while urgency level B increased from 38% to 41%. While the proportion of patients in acute critical condition was 16% vs. 8% among level of urgency A and B, and stable during the period, the number of patients in acute critical condition increased by 3.6 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.7-6.6) and 6.1 (95% CI 4.4-7.8) per quarter. Across the total population, patient age increased from 64 to 66 years, and the proportion with severe comorbidity increased from 11% to 14%.

conclusionFrom 2017 to 2023, the number of patients assigned with an ambulance through 1-1-2 increased, as did patient age and comorbidity. During the years were similar proportions of acute critical severity, but increasingly more among urgency level B. Thus, the acute severity among prehospital patients has not diminished. The lack of alignment between the level of urgencies and the acuity severity found on scene should be monitored carefully, together with mortality and clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

AmbulancesCritical IllnessEmergency Medical ServicesRegistriesTriageAcute DiseaseAdultAgedCohort StudiesDenmarkFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSeverity of Illness IndexDecision support systemsEarly warning scoreEmergency medical dispatchEmergency medical servicesPatient acuityTriage

Identifiers

PMID42323689
PMCPMC13508413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.