ArticleBMC medical ethics2026
Judicial substitute consent for medical procedures in adults lacking decision-making capacity: a five-year experience from a Polish tertiary hospital.
Article in BMC medical ethics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInformed consent is a fundamental ethical requirement in medical practice and an expression of respect for patient autonomy. However, when adult patients lack decision-making capacity and no legal representative is available, Polish law requires substitute consent from a guardianship court. Empirical data on this mechanism in routine clinical practice remain limited.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective review of court petitions submitted by a tertiary academic medical center in eastern Poland seeking judicial authorization for medical procedures involving adult patients between June 2019 and June 2024. In total, 240 case files were analysed, including data on patient characteristics, causes of incapacity, requested procedures, court decisions, and time to judicial decision.
resultsThe median patient age was 73 years (interquartile range 62-83), and 76.7% of patients were aged 61 years or older. The most common cause of incapacity was impaired verbal-logical communication (65.0%), followed by unconsciousness (20.8%) and dementia (7.5%). The most frequently requested procedures were blood transfusions or administration of blood products (n = 201), placement of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube (n = 149), and tracheostomy (n = 27). Court authorization was granted in 97.1% of cases, with a median decision time of 5 days.
conclusionsJudicial substitute consent in Poland primarily concerns older patients with acute neurological impairment or advanced multimorbidity. Although approval rates are high and median processing times are relatively short, even brief delays may have clinically and ethically significant consequences in time-sensitive situations. These findings highlight the need to balance legal safeguards, patient autonomy, and timely access to care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.