ArticlePatient safety in surgery2026
Increased injury severity and age-related mortality in trauma victims after e-bike versus conventional bicycle accidents: a concerning call to action!
Article in Patient safety in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough e-bike accidents are of growing clinical relevance, there is limited large-scale research comparing injury patterns and outcomes between e-bike (EB) and conventional bicycle (CB) accidents in large patient cohorts. This study performed comparative analyses of both groups to identify patients at risk and guide future prevention and clinical management strategies.
methodsA retrospective analysis of the TraumaRegister DGU
resultsA total of 9,170 bicycle accident cases were included (EB n = 1,160; CB n = 8,010). EB riders were significantly older than CB riders (median age 63 years; IQR 53-73 vs. 57 years IQR 44-69; p < 0.001) and more frequently sustained polytrauma (16.7% vs. 12.3%; p < 0.001). Compared with CB riders, EB riders more often suffered injuries to the head (67.2% vs. 56.2%; p < 0.01), face (22.7% vs. 17.8%; p < 0.001), and chest (55.2% vs. 51.8%; p = 0.030), and were more likely to sustain injuries affecting multiple body regions (p < 0.001). Primary ICU treatment was required more frequently after EB accidents (70.3% vs. 63.5%; p < 0.001). Age-stratified analyses showed that younger EB riders were more frequently involved in nighttime and alcohol-related accidents, whereas mortality increased significantly with age, from 2.7% in patients aged 16-59 years to 18.6% in those aged ≥ 80 years.
conclusionsE-bike accidents are associated with a higher prevalence of head, face, and chest injuries, increased rates of polytrauma and multi-region injuries, and a greater need for ICU treatment compared with conventional bicycle accidents. These differences are particularly relevant in older riders, who represent the majority of severely injured e-bike users and experience substantially higher mortality rates. Targeted prevention strategies, improved protective measures, and age-specific risk communication may help reduce the burden of e-bike-related injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.