ArticleBMC medical education2026
Construction of a faculty competency model for medical simulation education integrated with GenAI: a multi-method quantitative study based on the perspective of medical students.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe rapid advancement of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is reshaping the landscape of medical simulation education, necessitating the enhancement of faculty competencies to effectively integrate evolving knowledge systems with GenAI for collaborative decision-making. However, current educational technologies face systemic limitations, including fragmented functionality, a disconnect between conventional and GenAI-driven teaching approaches, and a lack of dynamic capability assessment tools. Constructing a standardised capability scale is crucial to overcoming adaptation bottlenecks.
methodsGrounded in the integrated Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework, this research proposed a two-round Delphi method to construct a faculty competency assessment scale, with stratified sampling involving 434 participants from clinical medicine, medical technology, and nursing fields. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) were used to test model fit (CFI = 0.939, RMSEA = 0.117). This proposed research was not registered as a clinical trial.
resultsThe resulting 16-item scale exhibited strong psychometric properties, demonstrating excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.979), sampling adequacy (KMO = 0.961), and significant sphericity (Bartlett's test, p < 0.001). No factor covariance was detected, and item consensus was high (Kendall's W = 0.761, p < 0.001). The model showed acceptable fit (χ²/df = 6.893).
conclusionThis empirically validated and standardised assessment model provides robust support for integrating GenAI with simulation-based health sciences education. It offers a foundational framework for advancing faculty competency development and fostering adaptive, technology-enhanced teaching practices, while noting that the scale primarily captures ethical awareness rather than comprehensive governance competence.
trial registrationNot applicable. As this research did not involve clinical interventions, trial registration was not required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.