Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42323561›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2026

Imaginative play for inclusion: evaluating the young dragons tabletop role-playing intervention in UK schools.

Austen El-Osta, Yiran Li, Sami Altalib, Aos Alaa, Rebecca Linsley, Sarah Newman, Etiene Steyn, Garry Harper, David Coulter, Cornelia Junghans Minton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Austen El-OstaSelf-Care Academic Research Unit (SCARU), Imperial College London School of Public Health, London, W12 0BZ, UK. a.el-osta@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-8772-4938
Yiran LiDepartment of Primary Care & Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, 90 Wood Lane, London, W12 0BZ, UK.ORCID 0009-0001-3320-3758
Sami AltalibSelf-Care Academic Research Unit (SCARU), Imperial College London School of Public Health, London, W12 0BZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7404-8486
Aos AlaaSelf-Care Academic Research Unit (SCARU), Imperial College London School of Public Health, London, W12 0BZ, UK.
Rebecca LinsleyRoyal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, Westminster City Council, 64 Victoria St, London, SW1E 6QP, UK.
Sarah NewmanRoyal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, Westminster City Council, 64 Victoria St, London, SW1E 6QP, UK.
Etiene SteynRoyal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, Westminster City Council, 64 Victoria St, London, SW1E 6QP, UK.
Garry HarperMythic Minds CIC, Carter Court, Southall, London, UB2 4GU, UK.
David CoulterMythic Minds CIC, Carter Court, Southall, London, UB2 4GU, UK.
Cornelia Junghans MintonDepartment of Primary Care & Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, 90 Wood Lane, London, W12 0BZ, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSchool exclusion in England disproportionately affects pupils with social, emotional, and mental health needs. Tabletop roleplaying games (TTRPGs) may strengthen social emotional learning but are rarely evaluated in UK state schools. Young Dragons, a Dungeons & Dragons based programme, was developed to support emotional regulation, teamwork, and engagement among pupils at risk of exclusion in two London boroughs.

methodsA convergent mixed methods realist evaluation was delivered across ten schools. Pupils aged 9-16 attended weekly one-hour sessions for 6-8 weeks in small, consistent groups. Pre/post pupil surveys captured wellbeing, self-concept, peer relations, school belonging, and loneliness; matched pair change (n = 22) used Wilcoxon signed rank tests. Semi-structured interviews with school staff and facilitators and observation of multiagency meetings explored implementation and perceived impact. Findings were integrated using joint displays and context-mechanism-outcome (CMO) mapping.

resultsNo statistically significant within person change was detected across matched items (all p > 0.10). Distributions showed heterogeneous trajectories: many pupils reported better mood, anger regulation, and confidence, while a minority shifted toward greater disengagement or loneliness. Exploratory analysis of routine school records (n = 30) showed a significant reduction in mean suspensions from 0.7 pre-intervention to 0.0 post-intervention (p = 0.022) and a modest, non-significant increase in mean attendance from 90.6% to 92.7% (p = 0.069). Qualitative accounts described strong engagement, psychological safety, and visible gains in self-management, turn taking, and teamwork, with positive spillover into classroom behaviour when groups were stable and facilitation was consistent. Delivery challenges included timetable pressures, space constraints, and stigma around targeted provision. Integration identified skilled facilitation, small-group safety, and structured reflection as key mechanisms enabling co-regulation, perspective taking, and belonging.

conclusionYoung Dragons was feasible and acceptable in high need school settings. Benefits were mechanism-consistent for many participants but contingent on context and facilitator quality. These pilot data justify a larger, controlled evaluation to test causal pathways and longer-term outcomes for inclusion and emotional wellbeing.

Indexed as

Role PlayingSchoolsStudentsAdolescentChildFemaleHumansLondonLonelinessMaleProgram EvaluationSelf ConceptUnited KingdomAdolescent mental healthAt-risk pupilsDungeons & DragonsEmotional regulationInclusionMixed-methods evaluationNarrative-based interventionRealist evaluationSchool exclusionSelf-managementSocial and emotional learning (SEL)Tabletop role-playing games (TTRPG)TeamworkUK schools

Identifiers

PMID42323561
PMCPMC13531801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.