ReviewBMC medical research methodology2026
Challenges and recent advances in methods for handling imbalanced multiclass classification problems: a methodological review.
Review in BMC medical research methodology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClass imbalance is a common challenge in real-world health science applications, including medical diagnosis, rare disease detection, and ICU mortality prediction, where one or more classes are underrepresented. Although several methods address imbalance in binary classification, multiclass imbalance remains particularly challenging due to multiple minority classes, often leading to biased performance and reduced predictive accuracy. Despite several advancements, most classification models struggle to identify patterns in imbalanced data, limiting their effectiveness in real-world applications.
methodsA structured literature search was conducted to identify methodological studies on imbalanced multiclass classification, including algorithmic strategies and advances in performance evaluation. Articles published up to 2024 were retrieved from Scopus and Web of Science using predefined keywords. Studies were screened through titles and abstracts based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, with additional backward citation searching for methodologically relevant studies. In total, 75 studies were included in the final methodological review to synthesize key challenges and recent advances.
resultsDespite the introduction of several metrics for assessing multiclass imbalance, the Imbalance Ratio (IR) remains the most commonly used measure for quantifying imbalance severity. Existing balancing techniques mainly rely on distance-based, cluster-based, and distribution-based approaches, reflecting methodological diversity. In multiclass settings, various decomposition strategies, classification algorithms, and performance metrics have been proposed to address imbalance; however, repeated use of imbalance-handling mechanisms, such as class weight adjustments across decomposition, training, and evaluation stages, may introduce bias. The effectiveness of these strategies depends on data characteristics including dimensionality, sample size, distribution, number of classes, and imbalance severity. Notably, insufficient reporting of these characteristics in many studies limits the assessment of feasibility and generalizability across diverse data settings.
conclusionsThis review synthesizes the strengths and limitations of existing methods for handling imbalanced multiclass classification, offering practical insights for improving model robustness and predictive performance. Effective management of class imbalance supports several Sustainable Development Goals by promoting equitable decision-making and enhancing reliable analysis across diverse health, societal, and environmental challenges, making it essential for developing robust and generalizable models across diverse domains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.