ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026
Physics-Informed Neural Operators for Parameter Inference in Multi-vessel Cardiovascular Networks.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAccurate, patient-specific haemodynamic assessment is limited by the cost of computational solvers and the sparsity of clinical measurements. We demonstrate that physics-informed neural operator surrogates can emulate multi-vessel 1D haemodynamics with sufficient accuracy and speed to enable Bayesian parameter inference and non-invasive pressure estimation in a clinically relevant setting.
methodsWe construct neural operator surrogates for a 17-vessel 1D systemic arterial network with prescribed inflow and structured-tree outflow, using DeepONet, POD-DeepONet and Fourier Neural Operator (FNO) architectures that map inflow waveforms and biophysical parameters (vessel stiffnesses and microvascular properties) to flow and pressure fields. Conservation laws, PDE residuals and bifurcation conditions are incorporated via physics-informed loss terms. To generate realistic inflow boundary conditions from limited clinical data, we compare generative models and adopt a Wasserstein autoencoder. The best-performing surrogate is embedded in a Bayesian pipeline to perform MCMC-based parameter inference and non-invasive pressure prediction for two Fontan patients using sparse 4D flow MRI waveforms.
resultsThe physics-informed FNO architecture achieved the lowest median relative errors across all vessels and markedly reduced maximum errors compared with purely data-driven training. In synthetic inverse tests, the PINO recovered vascular parameters more accurately than DeepONet and POD-DeepONet. For two Fontan patients, the calibrated model reproduced measured flow waveforms and yielded brachial pressure predictions consistent with cuff measurements, together with posterior uncertainty bands.
conclusionsPhysics-informed neural operators can emulate multi-vessel haemodynamics with high accuracy at a fraction of the computational cost of traditional solvers. Coupled with Bayesian inference, the proposed framework enables practical, uncertainty-aware estimation of vascular parameters and non-invasive pressure waveforms from sparse clinical flow data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42323515What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.