ArticleScientific reports2026
Characterization and comparative analysis of the complete chloroplast genomes of twelve Allium species from Kazakhstan.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current and Future Distributions ofEcology and evolution · 2026Article
- The Complete Chloroplast Genome ofGenes · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The genus Allium L. represents one of the largest and taxonomically complex groups of monocots, with Central Asia recognized as a major center of its diversity. Despite the high species richness of Allium in Kazakhstan, genomic data for many native taxa remain limited. In this study, we sequenced, assembled, and analyzed the complete chloroplast genomes of 12 Allium species from Kazakhstan. All chloroplast genomes exhibited a conserved quadripartite structure, with genome sizes ranging from 152,029 to 153,521 bp and a uniform gene content of 137 genes, including 88 protein-coding genes, 38 tRNAs, 8 rRNAs, and 3 pseudogenes. Comparative analyses revealed high structural conservation, with most sequence divergence concentrated in intergenic regions. Several highly variable regions, including ycf1, matK, rpoC2, and ycf2, were identified as potential molecular markers. Phylogenetic analyses based on chloroplast genome sequences using Maximum Likelihood and Bayesian approaches recovered three major chloroplast genome-based lineages within Allium, largely consistent with previous phylogenomic studies. Divergence-time analyses suggested that major chloroplast lineage diversification events within the genus occurred during the early Eocene (ca. 47.97 Mya). Overall, this study expands the currently available chloroplast genomic resources for Allium from Kazakhstan, provides insights into chloroplast genome evolution and chloroplast genome-based relationships, and establishes a valuable foundation for future phylogenetic, taxonomic, and evolutionary studies of this diverse genus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.