ArticleCarbon balance and management2026
Evolutionary characteristics and implementation effects of China's low-carbon policy system: a quantitative analysis based on policy texts.
Article in Carbon balance and management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
China's low-carbon policy system is a key institutional arrangement for advancing carbon disclosure, promoting green transformation, and supporting the achievement of the "dual-carbon"goals. However, existing studies have paid limited attention to the policy system itself as an integrated and evolving object of analysis. To address this gap, this paper develops a three-dimensional analytical framework of policy instruments, policy objectives, and policy effectiveness, and applies content analysis and temporal interval analysis to 1008 coded policy documents issued between 2007 and 2024. The results show that first, policy instruments are structurally imbalanced, with environment-type instruments dominating the policy mix, while supply-side and demand-side instruments remain relatively insufficient. Second, policy objectives are primarily oriented toward the national "dual-carbon"strategy, with comparatively limited attention to corporate sustainable development and investors' low-carbon information needs. Third, policy effectiveness is unevenly distributed, as most policy texts are concentrated in provincial-level guiding documents, whereas high-authority policy documents remain limited. Fourth, China's low-carbon policy system exhibits a clear three-stage evolution, moving from initial exploration to system construction and deepening, and then to adaptation and innovation. Finally, broader trend-based evidence suggests that changes in carbon emissions, green finance, and firm-level green transformation are broadly aligned with the direction of China's low-carbon policy development. By shifting the analytical focus from isolated policy measures to the policy system itself, this study provides a more systematic basis for understanding the internal logic and evolutionary dynamics of China's low-carbon governance, while also offering policy implications for China and institutional reference for other developing countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.