ArticleJournal of racial and ethnic health disparities2026
Motivators and Barriers Affecting Decisions to Participate in Clinical Trials for Sickle Cell Disease: United States Findings from the Quantitative LISTEN Survey.
Article in Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sickle cell disease (SCD) is an inherited blood disorder that results in abnormal hemoglobin and crescent-shaped red blood cells. While SCD was discovered over a century ago, it has historically had fewer new drugs in development compared with other conditions, negatively impacting patients' therapeutic options. Recently, there has been a substantial increase in the development of novel therapies for SCD, but the perception that people with SCD (PwSCD) are hesitant to participate in clinical trials remains pervasive. Enhancing our understanding of factors that influence the participation of PwSCD in clinical trials is critical to ensuring trial completion, thereby supporting the development of new treatments. The Learnings and Insights into Sickle Cell Trial Experiences (LISTEN) Survey was a global, mixed methods study where PwSCD and health care professionals (HCPs) were surveyed about the importance of specific factors such as impact on daily life, treatment impact, and wider clinical trial outcomes, as well as basic trial information and further considerations, when deciding to participate in a trial. PwSCD were surveyed about their personal perspectives whereas HCPs were surveyed about their perceptions of patient perspectives towards these factors and channels. In the United States, we identified areas of disconnect between the perspectives of PwSCD and HCPs. Additionally, geographic region, education, income, sex, disease severity, and trial experience contextualized PwSCD responses and provided additional insights. Results from this survey may guide the design of future clinical trials and strengthen how HCPs and trial sponsors communicate with PwSCD, thereby reducing trial participation barriers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42323491What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.