Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42323482›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

A neurocognitive interactive activation model of semantic priming in lexical decisions.

Leo Sokolovič, Juraj Kukolja, Markus Hofmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Leo SokolovičDepartment of General and Biological Psychology, University of Wuppertal, 42119, Wuppertal, Germany. leo.sokolovic@outlook.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7449-925X
Juraj KukoljaDepartment of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Helios University Hospital Wuppertal, 42883, Wuppertal, Germany.
Markus HofmannDepartment of General and Biological Psychology, University of Wuppertal, 42119, Wuppertal, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study introduces the sequential read-out model (SROM) to investigate the strategic and decision-making contributions to the semantic priming effect in a lexical-decision task (LDT). We use behavioral and fMRI data from two experiments (n = 32 and 31), which factorially manipulated the association strength, semantic similarity, and stimulus-onset-asynchrony. Using a leaky competing accumulator layer for lexical decisions, the SROM successfully accounted for behavioral data and showed that switching from short to long stimulus-onset-asynchrony changed the decision-making mode from competitive to independent race regime. We then used the individually estimated SROM parameters to predict the interindividual differences in BOLD responses to targets. We found that lexical-orthographic evidence modulated BOLD amplitudes in the left lingual gyrus, suggesting that it maintains lexico-orthographic evidence in working memory, which is then used for lexical decisions. The decision threshold, inhibition parameters and top-down semantic excitation predicted activation differences in the left inferior frontal gyrus, suggesting it regulates the decision process. Decision noise and top-down semantic excitation were associated with the left angular gyrus, supporting its involvement in evidence accumulation. Overall, the SROM provided mechanistic interpretations of brain activations in the regions involved in the semantically primed LDT, while accounting for associative semantic and strategic factors.

Indexed as

CognitionDecision MakingSemanticsAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMemory, Short-TermReaction TimeYoung Adultassociative and semantic primingfMRIinteractive activation modelleaky competing accumulators

Identifiers

PMID42323482
PMCPMC13283216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.