ArticleScientific reports2026
Ecological and methodological insights from genetic and coprological profiling of gastrointestinal communities in wild howler monkeys.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The gastrointestinal tract hosts a complex community of microorganisms and helminth parasites that collectively contribute to host health and fitness. Analysis of these communities provides insight into diverse aspects of host dietary ecology, immunity, nutrition, and host-parasite interactions. However, research methodologies, such as sample preservation and sequencing approach, can influence how we understand and characterize these features. Here, we profiled the gastrointestinal microbial and helminth communities in different groups of wild Costa Rican mantled howler monkeys (Alouatta palliata palliata). We compared samples stored in ethanol versus directly flash frozen, and contrasted conclusions drawn from 16S versus shotgun sequencing approaches. Bacterial, archaeal, and eukaryotic taxa associated with the digestion of plant material dominated the GI communities. Storage and sequencing methods influenced microbial profiles: ethanol-stored samples exhibited higher diversity than frozen samples, and 16S sequencing detected lower diversity than shotgun. Helminths were detected via coprological microscopy in 71% of individuals, whereas metagenomic detection was inconsistent. This study provides new data on the microorganisms and their putative digestive functions in the gut of a folivorous primate, and highlights the pros and cons of different methodological choices when profiling host-microbiome and host-parasite interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.