ArticleScientific reports2026
Classifying mental stress from eye tracking data: deep learning approaches for out-of-the-lab conditions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Eye-tracking signals such as pupil diameter and gaze behavior have been widely used for stress detection, yet most approaches rely on task-specific features, controlled laboratory settings, or multimodal sensor combinations, limiting scalability in less controlled environments. This work investigates whether unimodal eye-tracking time-series data can support task-agnostic stress detection beyond static laboratory tasks. We analyze stress classification across two complementary datasets: a virtual reality goalkeeper task with moderate visuomotor activity and stable recording conditions, and a virtual job interview dataset reflecting less controlled settings with uncalibrated signals. The results show that these signals alone contain informative patterns related to stress-associated autonomic and oculomotor responses. Under favorable conditions, performance reaches up to [Formula: see text] macro-averaged F1-score. At the same time, performance varies substantially across datasets, indicating that effective learning depends strongly on data quality, calibration, signal characteristics, and task design. Overall, the findings demonstrate the potential of unimodal eye tracking as a lower-burden alternative to more complex multimodal systems, while highlighting that reliable stress detection is fundamentally conditioned by the interplay of data, signal representation, and modeling approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.