ArticleScientific reports2026
Automated segmentation of neurons and spinal cord structures in immunofluorescence images using SpineDL.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this study, we present SpineDL, an open-source deep learning (DL) approach for neuron and anatomical structure segmentation of the spinal cord in fluorescence images immunostained with NeuN and DAPI, within the context of murine models of spinal cord injury (SCI). SpineDL comprises two main modules: SpineDL-Neuron, for instance-level identification of neuronal somas; and SpineDL-Structure, for semantic segmentation of key spinal cord structures including gray matter, white matter, ependyma, and damaged tissue. To train the models, we developed the SpineDL dataset, a curated collection of 161 confocal images of mouse spinal cord, manually annotated by SCI researchers and organized into specific subsets. Both models are based on the HRNetV2-W64 architecture and were trained using state-of-the-art data augmentation and optimization techniques, implemented within the BiaPy framework, following an iterative refinement process driven by quantitative evaluation, SCI researcher feedback, and systematic error analysis. Our results demonstrate that SpineDL achieves researcher-level performance in both structural segmentation and neuron identification tasks, showing high robustness across anatomical regions and injury conditions. Overall, this work provides a reproducible and extensible platform for quantitative analysis of neuron distribution in the naïve and injured spinal cord, supporting automation, standardization, and scalability of histopathological workflows in neuroscience research and preclinical studies and translational applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.