ArticleScientific reports2026
Isolating fast and slow flows in three-dimensional fluid dynamics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Isolating fast and slow flows in three-dimensional fluid dynamics.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In complex flows where motions at distinctly different speeds co-exist on the same plane, current optical flow (OF) methods preferentially track the slower component due to the small-motion assumption in OF algorithms. We overcome this limitation by balancing light intensity and applying per-pixel time-based high-pass filtering. We demonstrate this method using schlieren video of air motion generated by speech, where fast speech air flow co-exists with slower buoyancy flows from body heat-discrimination impossible with conventional OF. Our method extracted air flow patterns several centimetres from the mouth as a function of spoken sounds, with peak velocities in the English "pa" sound agreeing with CFD simulations. The method allows analysis of spatial and temporal variation in air velocity at distance from the speaker's lips, made by different sounds (phones). To do this, kymographs (space-time velocity plots) were generated and analysed using Generalized Additive Mixed-effect Models (GAMM). At 30 cm from the lips, statistical models showed higher predictive power ([Formula: see text]: 2.64%→7.57%), reduced complexity, and improved fit (fREML: 6.8E7→7.3E6, 89.3% residual reduction) compared to uncorrected data. The method is generalizable to any 3D optically accessible flow with motion predominantly in the image plane containing co-located high and low speed motions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.