ArticleScientific reports2026
A scalable solution for multi-symptom disease prediction and lifestyle recommendations using machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate prediction of diseases from multiple co-occurring symptoms remains an important challenge in intelligent healthcare systems. Machine-learning models can support early symptom-based risk screening; however, their clinical use is limited by dataset quality, lack of external validation, interpretability concerns, and the risk of overstated diagnostic claims. This study presents a mobile decision-support prototype for multi-symptom disease prediction and rule-based lifestyle recommendation. The experiments were conducted using the publicly available Kaggle Medicine Recommendation System Dataset, which contains 4,920 symptom-based records spanning 41 disease classes, along with supporting files for disease descriptions, precautions, medications, dietary suggestions, and workout recommendations. Seven supervised machine-learning models were evaluated, including Decision Tree, Random Forest, Naive Bayes, Logistic Regression, XGBoost, Support Vector Machine, and K-Nearest Neighbors. The best-performing models achieved high classification accuracy under the adopted evaluation protocol. To avoid overinterpretation, these results are reported as benchmark performance on a secondary public dataset rather than evidence of clinical diagnostic validity. The Android-Flask prototype links the predicted disease class to a lookup-based recommendation layer that retrieves disease-associated information from supporting datasets. The system should therefore be interpreted as a decision-support and educational prototype, not as a clinically validated diagnostic or prescribing tool. Future work should include external validation in independent clinical cohorts, clinician assessment of recommendations, robustness testing under missing or noisy symptom data, and broader evaluation across real-world healthcare settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.