ArticleScientific reports2026
Digital image analysis coupled with artificial neural networks for simultaneous prediction of biomass and pigments in microalgal cultivation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Real-time, non-destructive monitoring of multiple physiological parameters in microalgal cultures remains a significant analytical challenge, as conventional methods are destructive, time-consuming, and unsuitable for in situ applications. This study developed a novel digital image analysis framework integrating five color spaces (RGB, HSI, HSV, L*a*b*, YCbCr) with two distinct modeling platforms-Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Response Surface Methodology (RSM)-for the simultaneous prediction of biomass (optical density, OD₇₅₀) and key pigments (chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and total carotenoids) in Dunaliella salina cultures subjected to combined salinity and light stress. Validation using an independent cultivation dataset demonstrated that the optimal modeling approach was dictated by the physiological nature of the target parameter: ANN models significantly outperformed RSM for non-linear, stress-induced responses, with the ANN-RGB model achieving the best carotenoid prediction (MSE: 0.507, R²: 0.918) and the ANN-L*a*b* model excelling for chlorophyll a (MSE: 0.252, R²: 0.814), whereas a simpler RSM-YCbCr model sufficed for chlorophyll b (MSE: 0.514, R²: 0.670). Novel temporal error analysis (CDF and Heatmap) further revealed the superior stability of ANN models throughout the full cultivation cycle. This low-cost, image-based AI framework offers a robust, non-invasive tool for real-time monitoring in microalgal bioprocessing and smart farming applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.